Whats considered running well then? If it's results, then those speak for themselves. There are only so many EASPL teams around (None in Newton, but why? What is the Reason? 1 per distrcit?), and only so many Metro teams, and "Newton" teams always seem to do well there. From D1-Metro. Certainly if there was an EASPL team based out of Newton they do well also.
The problem as I see it is that ALL soccer should matter, not just the higher divisions. Each club should focus on developing and maintaining their talent pool and not keep looking over the fence at what is on the other clubs roster. Sure if a player tries out for a spot then fine, but we all know this isnt what happens in Newton.
Too many kids are passed over for even rec teams. Is this what Soccer should be about?
The players are the minnows and the coaches are sharks.
Newton/Surrey has the biggest population. Take those kids from Surrey, put them in Maple Ridge and put the Maple Ridge kids in Surrey. See what happens to the results of those clubs.
I am not saying they don't have good players or coaching. I am saying by default they have more good players and coaching relative to the other Lower Mainland clubs.
When I hear about how teams are selected, how teams are placed in leagues, about clubs being banned - you can't convince me that things are being run well.